Today voters across Texas will go to the polls to cast ballots in state and local races. Right here in the Hill Country, voters will be asked to consider 10 proposed amendments to the state’s constitution. In the city of  Kerrville, voters will be asked to consider 19 proposed changes to the charter — the city’s governing document. 

In the case of Kerrville, we recommend approving 17 of the 19 propositions on the ballot. Most of these changes to the city’s charter are simple, eliminating redundancy and better aligning with state law. However, Propositions N and Q remove some specific language that could compromise transparency, and we recommend a no vote — sending this back to the City Council and city staff for a rewrite. 

As this Editorial Board has written about before, we fully support many of the improvements this City Council and staff have made to move the city forward, including the Kerrville 2050 plan. However, there are times when we believe we have to draw a line, especially as it involves maintaining a transparent government. 

Despite city assurances, Proposition N, which aims to streamline the budget process, is problematic for us because it places an emphasis on the city’s website as the sole arbiter of information about the city budgeting process. We will still report on these matters, but it was incumbent upon the city to advertise these changes with one of the community’s newspapers. That’s a good requirement to have. 

The problem with the city’s website is that it can’t be relied on to draw mass readers the way community newspapers do, and if residents go there to seek out budget information. Further, this change in the city’s charter doesn’t spell out some of the technological questions that many would have, such as:

Does the budget information need to be on the home page? 

Should it be shared on social media?

Does it have to be searchable by Google or other web search engines? 

Is it an HTML file or a PDF? 

Does it require a password? 

The changes outlined in Proposition N require none of those disclosures, and we believe that removing the specifics leaves it open to the broadest interpretation. 

In the case of Proposition Q, the city is looking to streamline the process for potential franchises to come in and offer essential city services such as power or cable television, etc. The existing process includes a recommendation that an ordinance granting franchise rights be advertised in a newspaper for four weeks. That has been stricken from the proposition. 

Like Proposition N, this move feels anti-transparent, and we cannot recommend approval. We agree that the former process was lengthy, but there’s a reason why previous councils and administrations put the language there in the first place — to protect the residents of this city. 

In the end, we recommend approval of 17 of the 19 Kerrville ballot propositions to change the city charter, but we recommend a no vote on proposals N and Q.

Recommended for you

(2) comments

john

Does anyone pay attention to what KDT editors think?

Conservative

Good question John. Obviously, with Lewis a the helm there have been some big changes at the KDT in the form of asserting more forceful positions on local issues. Kerr County, like most small towns in Texas has a power structure that is hard to understand, and this is by design. I think Lewis is a capable guy and will eventually learn where the bodies are buried, so I will give him a pass for now. I think he is too emotional, and sometimes writes before he thinks. A good example of this is when he criticised his readers for voting in a KDT poll in a way that was in conflict his personal political views. I am optimistic we have seen the last of this and he will eventually come around once he takes in the complete political landscape here. I think he is a smart, well intentioned fellow and will eventually be an asset to the community.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.